Chapter 10 –
Dietrich Bonhoeffer & the Ethics of Participation
*I have to
admit, this chapter left me disappointed.
It was slow and arduous reading, with very little in the way of good discussion
material. So, let’s touch briefly upon
the major points and see what we can get out of this chapter together. ;-)
1. Bonhoeffer is the
contemporary champion of Luther’s “theology of the cross.” Hall divides his chapter into four distinct
sections as he flushes out this theology.
First, we have, “The Theology of the Cross as the Link.” While few of us share in the scholarly concern
over Bonhoeffer’s earlier versus later works, we can all benefits from the
common appreciation of his life-story. “There
are not two Bonhoeffers, only one.”
I have no idea why Hall includes this information in this introduction…do
you? Did I miss something? Please jump in!
2. Next, Hall asks, “What is the
Theology of the Cross?” In this
instance, it is the “essential thread” that runs through the complex tapestry
of Bonhoeffer’s life and work. Hall then
proceeds to discuss at great length the various interpretations of this
theology by myriad theologians over the centuries. This is a lot to take in!
As you consider Hall’s eight terse observations (only seven are
numbered), did any of them interest you?
Did you connect with one or more in any meaningful way?
3. Next, Hall discusses,
“Bonhoeffer’s Theology of the Cross.” Finally,
it gets interesting! As Visser ‘t Hooft
writes, Bonhoeffer insisted that “the church must stop defending itself and its
particular “religiosity” and simply be present in the world for others, as
Jesus Christ was.”
“Instead of pursuing a God who carries us off to some ecstatic
supranatural sphere, discipleship means pursuing the God who penetrates more
and more deeply into the life of the world…that is, among the abandoned, the
abused, the suffering, the marginalized.”
How do you draw a distinction between Christian faith and “religion,”
per se? Where was Bonhoeffer headed with
this?
4. Fourth, we have, “The Ethic
of the Theology of the Cross.”
Basically, Hall directs us from a world-oriented theology of the cross
to an ethic of the cross, which is participatory in character. “Bonhoeffer’s contribution is to envision and
embody a community of the cross with an ethic of imitation, or participation,
as the church’s societal vocation and presence.” Hall suggest we move from social to personal
ethics as a means of engagement (invoking sexual orientation as an example).
What does it mean for us to engage in Christian ethics, and where “in
the world” are we called to participate?
No comments:
Post a Comment